Assessing psychological violence and harassment at work: reliability and i.e., Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) and. ventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) Leymann defines .. el LIPT (Leymann Inventory of Psychological. Terrorization) en. Important note in preface to Heinz Leymann, “Mobbing . questionnaire ( Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization, Leymann, ).
|Published (Last):||22 December 2010|
|PDF File Size:||15.79 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The sources of bullying—psychological work environment and organizational climate. The prevalence of intense medium or high of psychological violence was 8. These findings could be useful in classifying existing scales of psychological harassment at work and comparison of findings based on different scales. An exploratory factor analysis showed that the first factor explained Previous studies showed that the IVAPT had an acceptable level of internal consistency Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.
The Japanese version of the IVAPT showed high internal consistency reliability according to Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the total sample and for both sexes.
But the LIPT may be less sensitive for measurement of psychological harassment at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol ; Assessing psychological violence and harassment at work: The results may be biased toward those who were willing to report their experience of inentory violence and harassment at work.
Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT)
A total of 1, were full-time workers, 46 were part-time workers, and 17 were employed for a temporary job. The Negative Acts Questionnaire: More detailed explanations for your need are more likely to get a response. The prevalence of psychological harassment at work based on the IVAPT definition medium or high was 5.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation References in periodicals archive? En la literatura internacional se cuenta ya con un buen numero de cuestionarios para medir acoso o violencia laboral, algunos de ellos son los siguientes: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of internal consistency reliability was calculated for column A responses and column B responses for the total sample, men and women.
Psychological violence terroruzation harassment at work were more frequent among older respondents. In an exploratory factor analysis, eigenvalues and the total variance explained were My work is devalued and they never recognize my doing something well. My successes at work are ignored and maliciously attributed to other people or to foreign elements such as coincidence, luck, the market situation, etc. A total of 1, respondents men and women out of 2, initial respondents filled in all questions including sex, age, and the IVAPT.
Any opportunities that I may have for a promotion or improvement pzychological my work are blocked or impeded.
Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT) – Allie: Abbreviation / Long Form Info.
Distinguir lo verdadero de lo falso [Bullying at work. Mobbing at work and the development of posttraumatic stress disorders.
In addition, an additional final question asked whether the behaviors assessed have been produced by superiors, colleagues, or subordinates at work, which allows us to have reports of the directionality of the behaviors mobbing ascending, collateral, or descending.
January 11, [Advance Publication] Released: Factor loadings greater than 0. An exploratory factor analysis pf that the first factor explained February 15, Revised: Data did not well fit to previously reported one- or three-factor structures. The average duration SD of employment was For interpretation, the presence of psychological violence at work was defined based on conflict situations at work that, when not resolved, can be habitual behavior. Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace.
The prevalence of presence medium or high of psychological violence was Harassment in the workplace and the victimization psychologjcal man. The instructions, items and response options of the IVAPT were first translated from the English version into Japanese by a professional translator. They have tried to humiliate me or to make a fool of me in public. Eur J Work Organ Psychol ; 5: Malicious or slanderous rumors are spread by the company about me.
Second, respondents were asked to report the relative frequency of experiencing each item compared with their psychologicl in the column Busing three response options: Crisis social y desgaste ocupacional de los profesionales de la salud: The results may reflect more characteristics of the sample. They assign me work or projects with such short deadlines that they are impossible to fulfill. Sign up for further access to Scientific Publications and Authors! Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.
The average standard deviation, SD age of workers was The IVAPT was translated into Japanese, and the translation was amended through a small invenory and a back-translation and finalized.